Why do whole eras fall in love with bloated, affected, or showy ways of speaking? Seneca’s answer is an old proverb: “As people live, so they speak.” Our words grow out of our souls, so a self-indulgent age produces self-indulgent writing. He skewers the famously flowery Maecenas, mocks writers who copy another author’s quirks, and ends with a call to care for the one thing that governs everything else: “take care of the soul,” because thoughts, words, and even the way we walk all flow from it.
From Seneca to Lucilius
You’ve been asking me why, at certain periods, a degenerate style of speaking comes into fashion, and how people’s talents slide downhill into particular faults. At one time writing puffs itself up with a kind of inflated strength; at another it turns mincing and sing-song, like music at a concert. Sometimes bold ideas, bolder than you’d believe, are in favor; at other times you meet broken phrases full of hints, which you have to read more meaning into than the ear actually hears. And there have been whole eras that claimed the right to use metaphor shamelessly.
As They Live, So They Speak
For an answer, take a saying you often hear in everyday speech, which the Greeks have made into a proverb: “A person’s speech is just like his life.” Just as each individual’s actions seem to speak, a people’s way of speaking often reflects the general character of the time, when public morale has gone slack and given itself over to softness. Self-indulgence in speech is proof of public luxury, if it’s popular and fashionable and not limited to one or two individuals.
A person’s talent can’t be of one kind and his soul of another. If his soul is healthy, orderly, serious, and restrained, his talent is sound and sober too. When one degenerates, the other is contaminated as well. Don’t you see that if a person’s soul has grown sluggish, his limbs drag and his feet move lazily? That if it’s soft and affected, you can tell from his very walk? That a keen and confident soul quickens the step? That madness in the soul, or anger, which is like madness, speeds our movements from walking to rushing? How much more, then, do you think this affects a person’s talent, which is completely woven into the soul, shaped by it, obeying its commands and taking its laws from it!
The Case of Maecenas
How Maecenas lived is too well known to need comment now. We know how he walked, how affected he was, how much he wanted to show himself off, and how unwilling he was for his vices to go unnoticed. Well then, doesn’t the looseness of his writing match his loosely belted clothes? Are his habits, his attendants, his house, his wife any less clearly marked than his words? He would have been a man of great powers if he’d set to work on a straight path, if he hadn’t shied away from making himself understood, if he hadn’t been so loose in his style as well. So you’ll see that his eloquence was that of a drunk man: twisting, turning, endlessly slack.
What could be more unbecoming than these words: “A stream and a bank covered with long-tressed woods”? Or see how “men plow the channel with boats and, turning up the shallows, leave gardens behind them.” Or, “He curls his lady-locks, and coos, and starts sighing, like a forest lord who prays with bowed neck.” Or, “An unregenerate crew, they hunt people out at feasts, assail households with the wine cup, and, by hope, exact death.” Or, “A Genius could hardly bear witness to his own festival.” Or “threads of tiny tapers and crackling meal.” Or “mothers or wives clothing the hearth.”
The Man Behind the Words
Reading these words, can’t you immediately picture the man who always paraded through the city in a loose, flowing tunic? Even when he was carrying out the absent emperor’s duties, he was always in casual dress when people asked him for the password. Or the man who, as a judge on the bench, as a speaker, or at any public function, appeared with his cloak wrapped around his head, leaving only his ears showing, like a rich man’s runaway slaves in a farce? Or the man who, at the very time the state was torn by civil strife, when the city was in trouble and under martial law, went about in public attended by two eunuchs, both of them more manly than he was? Or the man who had only one wife, and yet married her countless times?
These words of his, put together so badly, tossed off so carelessly, and arranged so differently from normal practice, show that the character of their writer was equally unusual, unsound, and eccentric. To be sure, we give him the highest praise for his humanity: he was sparing with the sword and held back from bloodshed, and he showed off his power only in his loose living. But he spoiled this genuine praise, which he deserved, with his absurdly fussy style. It’s clear he wasn’t really gentle, just soft, as his misleading word order shows, along with his inverted expressions and his surprising thoughts, which often contain something great but have gone limp in the expressing. You’d say his head had been turned by too much success.
How Luxury Spreads
This fault comes sometimes from the person and sometimes from the age. When prosperity has spread luxury far and wide, people start by paying closer attention to their personal appearance. Then they go crazy over furniture. Next they turn to their houses: how to make them sprawl like country estates, how to make the walls glitter with marble imported from overseas, how to cover a ceiling with gold to match the shine of inlaid floors. After that they bring their refined taste to the dinner table, trying to win approval with novelty and by changing the usual order of dishes, so that what we normally serve at the end comes first, and departing guests are given the kind of food that used to be set before them on arrival.
Once the mind has gotten into the habit of scorning ordinary things and treating what used to be customary as beneath it, it starts hunting for novelty in speech too. Now it summons and shows off obsolete, old-fashioned words; now it coins unknown words or twists existing ones; and now bold, constant metaphor becomes a special feature of style, following whatever fashion has just taken hold.
Some cut their thoughts short, hoping to impress by leaving the meaning in doubt and making the listener suspect his own lack of wit. Some drag them out at length. Others come right up to the edge of a fault, which a person really must do if he hopes to make a grand effect, but they actually love the fault for its own sake. In short, whenever you notice that a degenerate style pleases the critics, you can be sure that character too has drifted from the right standard.
A Symptom of Disease
Just as lavish banquets and elaborate clothing are signs of disease in a state, so a lax style, if it’s popular, shows that the mind, the source of our words, has lost its balance. And you shouldn’t be surprised that corrupt speech is welcomed not only by the grubby crowd in the cheap seats but by our more cultured audience too, because they differ only in their clothes, not in their judgment.
You might be more surprised that not only the effects of vices but the vices themselves meet with approval. But it’s always been this way: no one’s talent has ever been approved without something being forgiven. Show me anyone, however famous, and I’ll tell you what his age forgave in him and what it deliberately overlooked. I can show you many people whose vices did them no harm, and not a few who were even helped by them. Yes, I’ll show you people of the highest reputation, held up as models to admire; yet if you try to correct their faults, you destroy them, because their vices are so intertwined with their virtues that they drag the virtues down with them.
Old Words, Dull Words, Grand Words
Besides, style has no fixed laws. It changes with the usage of the people and never stays the same for long. Many speakers reach back to earlier times for their vocabulary and talk in the language of the Twelve Tables. To them, Gracchus, Crassus, and Curio are too refined and too modern; so back to Appius and Coruncanius! On the other hand, some people, trying to use nothing but well-worn and common expressions, fall into a humdrum style.
Both groups, each in its own way, are degenerate. And it’s no less degenerate to use only words that are showy, high-sounding, and poetic, avoiding what’s familiar and ordinary. In my view, one is as faulty as the other: one group is unreasonably elaborate, the other unreasonably careless. The first fusses over every hair on its legs; the second doesn’t even groom its armpits.
Faults of Arrangement
Now let’s turn to the arrangement of words. Here I can show you countless kinds of faults! Some love abrupt, uneven style, deliberately disrupting anything that seems to flow smoothly. They want jolts in every transition; they think whatever sounds rough to the ear is strong and manly. With others, it’s less an arrangement of words than a setting to music, so coaxing and soft is their gliding style.
And what shall I say about the arrangement where words are put off and, after you’ve waited a long time, just manage to arrive at the end of the sentence? Or about that softly closing style, in Cicero’s manner, with a gradual, gently balanced descent, always the same, always with the usual rhythm? Nor is the fault only in the shape of the sentences, if they’re petty and childish, or degrading, with more daring than modesty should allow, or flowery and cloying, or if they end in emptiness, producing mere sound and nothing more.
Copying Another Writer’s Vices
Some individual makes these faults fashionable, someone who dominates the eloquence of the day; the rest follow his lead and pass the habit on to one another. So when Sallust was at his height, phrases were chopped off, words ended unexpectedly, and obscure brevity passed for elegance. Lucius Arruntius, a man of rare simplicity who wrote a history of the Punic War, was a member and strong supporter of the Sallust school. There’s a phrase in Sallust, exercitum argento fecit, meaning that he “made” an army with money. Arruntius took a liking to this, so he planted the verb “made” all through his book. In one passage he writes that the enemy “made flight for our men”; in another, “Hiero, king of the Syracusans, made war”; in another, “the news made the people of Panormus surrender to the Romans.”
I just wanted to give you a taste; his whole book is woven through with stuff like this. What Sallust saved for occasional use, Arruntius turned into a frequent, almost constant habit. And there was a reason: Sallust used the words as they came to his mind, while the other went searching for them. So you see the result of copying another person’s faults.
Again, Sallust wrote of “wintering waters.” Arruntius, in the first book of his Punic War, writes that “the storm suddenly wintered.” Elsewhere, wanting to describe an unusually cold year, he says, “the whole year wintered.” And in another passage: “he sent sixty light transports, besides the soldiers and necessary sailors, while the north wind wintered.” He keeps propping up passage after passage with this metaphor. In one place Sallust speaks of seeking “reputations” for fairness and goodness amid civil war, and Arruntius can’t stop himself from mentioning, right in his first book, that there were great “reputations” concerning Regulus.
Style Reveals Temperament
Faults like these, which imitation stamps on one’s style, aren’t necessarily signs of loose standards or a debased mind. But a writer’s own faults are bound to be personal and peculiar to him, letting you judge his temperament from them, just as an angry person talks angrily, an excitable person in a flurry, and a soft, self-indulgent person in a style that’s limp and yielding.
You see this in people who pluck out or thin their beards, or who closely shave the upper lip while letting the rest grow; in those who wear cloaks of outlandish colors or see-through togas, and who never stoop to do anything that might escape public notice. They try to excite and attract people’s attention, and they’ll even put up with criticism, as long as they can advertise themselves. That’s the style of Maecenas and all the others who stray from the path not by accident but consciously and on purpose.
Take Care of the Soul
This comes from great sickness in the soul. With drink, the tongue doesn’t stumble until the mind is overwhelmed by the load and gives way or betrays itself. In the same way, this intoxication of style, for what else can I call it, troubles no one unless the soul starts to totter. So I say: take care of the soul. For from the soul come our thoughts, from the soul our words, from the soul our dispositions, our expressions, and our very walk. When the soul is sound and strong, the style too is vigorous, energetic, and strong. But if the soul loses its balance, everything else comes crashing down with it.
While the king is safe, the swarm lives in harmony;
if he dies, the bees revolt.
The soul is our king. If it’s safe, the other faculties stay at their posts and serve obediently. But the slightest loss of balance in the soul makes them waver along with it. And when the soul has given in to pleasure, its faculties and actions grow weak, and every undertaking comes from a limp and unsteady source.
King or Tyrant
To keep using this comparison: our soul is sometimes a king and sometimes a tyrant. It’s a king when it respects what is honorable, watches over the welfare of the body entrusted to its care, and gives that body no shameful or base commands. But an uncontrolled, passionate, self-indulgent soul turns kingship into the most dreadful and hated thing, tyranny. Then it becomes the prey of unchecked emotions that dog its steps. At first it’s elated, to be sure, like a crowd idly stuffed with a handout that will eventually ruin it, spoiling what it can’t consume.
But when the disease has gradually eaten away its strength, and luxurious habits have soaked into the marrow and sinews, such a soul delights in seeing limbs it has made useless through overindulgence. Instead of its own pleasures, it watches other people’s. It becomes the go-between and spectator of passions that, because of its self-indulgence, it can no longer feel itself. An abundance of delights isn’t so much pleasant to such a soul as bitter, because it can’t send all the old delicacies down its overworked throat and stomach, and it’s gloomy because so much of its happiness is shut off by the limits of the body.
One Belly
Isn’t it madness, Lucilius, that none of us stops to reflect that he’s mortal? Or frail? Or that he’s only one person? Look at our kitchens, and the cooks bustling over so many fires: do you think all this bustle and preparation is for a single belly? Look at the old wines and the storehouses filled with vintages of many years: is all that stored wine, sealed with the names of so many consuls and gathered from so many vineyards, meant for a single belly? Look at how many regions people plow, and how many thousands of farmers till and dig: are crops planted in Sicily and Africa for a single belly?
We’d be more sensible, and our wants more reasonable, if each of us took stock of himself, measured his bodily needs too, and understood how little he can consume, and for how short a time! But nothing will help you toward moderation so much as the frequent thought that life is short and uncertain here. Whatever you’re doing, keep death in view.
Farewell.
Breaking It Down: A Modern Take on Letter 114
Letter 114 is one of the first great essays on how language reveals character. Seneca’s examples come from Roman writers we rarely read today, and some of his language about “soft” and “manly” styles reflects the gender assumptions of his time. But his central idea is timeless: the way people write and speak grows out of the way they live. Read it with today’s social media, corporate jargon, and political rhetoric in mind, and it feels startlingly current.
1. As we live, so we speak
“A person’s speech is just like his life.” Our words are a window into our habits and values. Careless living tends to produce careless words; honest living, honest words.
2. Language tracks a culture’s health
“Self-indulgence in speech is proof of public luxury.” When a whole society’s language becomes inflated, showy, or empty, it’s often a sign that something deeper has gone slack.
3. Talent and soul are one
“A person’s talent can’t be of one kind and his soul of another.” Even our walk shows our state of mind. Character leaks into everything we do.
4. Showing off weakens good qualities
Maecenas was genuinely humane, Seneca admits, but his affected style spoiled the praise he deserved. Vanity can obscure real virtues.
5. Luxury spreads step by step
First appearance, then furniture, then houses, then dinner, then speech itself. The mind starts hunting for novelty in speech too. Excess rarely stays in one area of life.
6. Popular bad style signals bad character
“Whenever you notice that a degenerate style pleases the critics, you can be sure that character too has drifted.” When a culture rewards spin and empty flourish, it’s worth asking what values it has lost.
7. Every famous person is partly forgiven
“No one’s talent has ever been approved without something being forgiven.” Even our heroes have flaws we overlook. That’s a reason for humility in admiration, and for grace toward ourselves.
8. Avoid both extremes
Seneca criticizes both the fussy, archaic, or showy writer and the lazy, humdrum one. Good writing, like good living, finds the mean.
9. Don’t copy others’ faults
Arruntius took one quirk of Sallust’s and turned it into a tic. “So you see the result of copying another person’s faults.” Imitation tends to copy what’s easiest to see, which is often the flaw rather than the strength.
10. Attention-seeking is a symptom
People who dress outrageously and do nothing that might escape notice “try to excite and attract people’s attention.” Today’s version is the constant bid for clicks and likes. Seneca saw it as a sign of an unsettled soul.
11. Take care of the soul
“Take care of the soul. For from the soul come our thoughts, from the soul our words, from the soul our dispositions, our expressions, and our very walk.” This is the heart of the letter. Fix the source, and everything downstream improves.
12. Be a king, not a tyrant
A healthy soul rules the body like a good king; an indulgent one becomes a tyrant, ruled by its own cravings until it can no longer even enjoy them. It’s a powerful picture of how addiction and excess hollow us out.
13. One belly, one life
“Do you think all this bustle and preparation is for a single belly?” Seneca’s closing image is a call to proportion. Each of us needs very little, for a very short time.
14. Keep death in view
“Nothing will help you toward moderation so much as the frequent thought that life is short and uncertain here.” Remembering mortality isn’t gloomy; it’s clarifying. It shrinks our wants to their right size.
Key Takeaways from Letter 114
- Speech mirrors life. How we live shows in how we talk.
- Language reveals culture. Inflated speech signals deeper slackness.
- Character leaks into everything. Even our walk shows our soul.
- Vanity hides virtue. Showing off spoils deserved praise.
- Excess spreads. Luxury moves from things to words.
- Watch what gets rewarded. Popular bad style signals lost values.
- Admire with humility. Every hero is partly forgiven.
- Find the mean. Avoid both showy and sloppy writing.
- Don’t copy flaws. Imitation often grabs the worst traits.
- Attention-seeking is a symptom. It points to an unsettled soul.
- Tend the soul first. Thoughts, words, and actions flow from it.
- Rule yourself like a good king. Don’t let cravings become tyrants.
- Remember you are one person. You need very little.
- Keep death in view. It keeps your wants in proportion.
“So I say: take care of the soul. For from the soul come our thoughts, from the soul our words, from the soul our dispositions, our expressions, and our very walk.”
— Seneca, Letter 114
Keep Seneca With You
If this letter spoke to you
More of Seneca’s essays and letters in one Penguin volume.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. It costs you nothing and helps keep these translations free.
Next up: Letter 115 — On the Superficial Blessings
[…] Next up: Letter 114 — On Style as a Mirror of Character […]